Analyze an image or a video
Drag and drop, or click to choose a file
8 images · 40 MB1 video · 300 MB
Nothing is uploaded: the analysis runs in your browser, a dropped file never leaves this device. For a link, only the address may go through our server if the site refuses direct access.
How to check an image in 3 steps
Drop the file — the original if possible
Drag in an image or video, or paste a link. The original file gives the most reliable result: screenshots and messaging copies have already lost most of the evidence.
Let the analysis run on your device
Each signal — provenance, metadata, compression, noise, spectrum, and a locally-run detection model — is checked in your browser and shown separately, with its own status.
Read the verdict with its reserves
You get a probability, its interval and a confidence level, plus a plain instruction. When signals are missing, the answer is “uncertain” — an honest answer, not a failure. A PDF report carries the same reserves.
Why use this AI image detector
- The engine runs inside your browser: no upload, no storage, no signup. For a link, only the address may pass through our server — never your files.
- Declared provenance, metadata, compression, noise, spectrum, temporal coherence — plus a trained model (Community Forensics, CVPR 2025) executed locally. Each signal is displayed on its own.
- Always a probability, an interval and a confidence level — never “100% AI”. When evidence is thin, the tool answers “uncertain” instead of inventing a certainty.
- The full analysis exports as a PDF that keeps every reserve and every limit — so a result is never quoted without what it does not prove.
Frequently asked questions
Can it prove an image was made by AI?
- No analysis can prove the origin of a file — this one included. The result is an estimate built from technical clues: a high score does not establish fraud, and a low score does not guarantee authenticity.
Why is the result often “uncertain” for WhatsApp or Facebook images?
- Those platforms recompress every image, and the fine traces the analysis relies on disappear at the first share. “Uncertain” is then the honest answer, not a defect. For a useful result, provide the original file — never a screenshot or a messaging copy.
Does missing metadata mean the image is fake?
- No. Almost every image in circulation has lost its metadata — that is the normal case, not a red flag. Absence never raises the score; it only lowers the confidence.
Are my images uploaded to a server?
- No. The engine and the detection model run in your browser, so a dropped file stays on your device. When you analyze a link, only the address may transit our server — never a file from your device.
Can it detect Google's SynthID watermark?
- No third-party tool can: Google has not published its detector. Only an optional mention in the metadata is readable — and its absence proves nothing.
Does it detect deepfakes — swapped faces?
- Not as such: no dedicated face detector is embedded, so a video manipulated only locally can pass the global checks. That limit is written in the report, before anyone relies on it.
What are Content Credentials (C2PA) worth here?
- They carry decisive weight only when the manifest's hard binding to the file's exact bytes is verified locally — a manifest copied onto another image is caught. The signer's identity, however, is not verified, and the screen says so.